ISSN: 2056-3736 (Online Version) | 2056-3728 (Print Version)
image_pdfimage_print

Public and Foreign Investment Spending in the Argentine Case. A Cointegration Analysis with Structural Breaks, 1960-2015

Miguel D. Ramirez

Correspondence: Miguel D. Ramirez, Miguel.ramirez@trincoll.edu

Department of Economics, Trinity College, USA

pdf (1176.06 Kb) | doi: https://doi.org/10.47260/bae/724

Abstract

This paper examines whether public investment spending and inward foreign direct investment (FDI) enhance labor productivity growth in Argentina. Using annual data, it estimates a dynamic labor productivity function for the 1960-2015 period that incorporates the impact of public and private investment spending, education expenditures, the labor force, and export growth. It tests for both single and two-break unit root tests, as well as performing cointegration tests with an endogenously determined regime shift over the 1960-2015 period. Cointegration analysis suggests that a long-term relationship exists among the relevant variables. The error correction (EC) models suggest that (lagged) increases in public investment spending and education have a positive and significant effect on the rate of labor productivity growth Also, the model is estimated for a shorter period (1970-2015) to capture the impact of inward FDI flows. The estimates suggest that (lagged) FDI flows have a positive and significant impact on labor productivity growth, while increases in the labor force have a negative effect. From a policy standpoint, the findings call into question the politically expedient policy in many Latin American countries, including Argentina during the 1990s and 2000s, of disproportionately reducing public capital expenditures on education and infrastructure to meet reductions in the fiscal deficit as a proportion of GDP. The results give further support to pro-investment and pro-growth policies designed to promote public investment spending and attract inward FDI flows.

Keywords:

  Complementarity Hypothesis, Education expenditures, Endogenous growth, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Gregory-Hansen cointegration single-break test, Lee-Strazicich two-break unit root test, Johansen Cointegration Test, Public Investment, Vector Error Correction model (VECM).


References

Agbloyor, E. K., Abor, J. Y., Adjasi, C. K. D., and Yawson, A. (2014), Private Capital Flows and Economic Growth in Africa: The Role of Domestic Financial Markets, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Vol. 30, 137-152.Albala-Bertrand, J.M. and E.C. Mamatzakis. 2001. “Is Public Infrastructure Productive?  Evidence from Chile.” Applied Economic Letters, 8 (March): 195-199.Aschauer, David A. 1989. “Is Public Expenditure Productive.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 24:177-200.Baer, Werner , P. Elosegui and A. Gallo, 2002. “The Achievements and Failures of Argentina’s  Neo-Liberal Economic Policies.” Oxford Economic Studies, 30, 1:63-85.Bose, N., Haque, M. E., and Osborn, D. R. (2007), Public Expenditure and Economic Growth: A   Disaggregated Analysis for Developing Countries, The Manchester School, Vol 75, No. 5, 533–556.Bouton, L. and Mariusz A. Sumlinski. 1999. “Trends in Private Investment in Developing Countries 1995: Statistics for 1970-1998.” Working Paper No. 41. Washington, D.C.: International Finance Corporation.Cardoso, Eliana. 1993. “Private Investment in Latin America.” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 41 (July): 833-848.Calva, Jose L. 1997. “Mercado y Estado en la Economia Mexicana: Retrovision y Prospectiva.” Problemas del Desarrollo, 28 (April/June): 71-102.Charemza, W.W. and D.F. Deadman. 1997. New Directions in Econometric Practice: General to Specific Modelling, Cointegration and Vector Autoregression. Cheltenhaum, U.K.: Edward Elgar Publishers.De Mello, L.R., Jr., 1997. “Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries and Growth: A Selective Survey,” Journal of Development Studies, 34 (October): 1-34.Devarajan, S. and Zou, H. 1994. “Does Public Investment Promote Economic Growth?” The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Working Paper no. 95-9: 1-27.Devarajan, S., V. Swaroop, and Heng-fu Zou. 1996. “The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Growth,” Journal of Monetary Economics 37: 313-344.ECLAC. 2018. Statistical Yearbook for Latin American and the Caribbean, 2018. Santiago,  Chile: United Nations.Engle, R.F. and C.W.J. Granger. 1987. “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.” Econometrica, 55: 251-76.Everhart, S.S. and Sumlinski, M.A., 2001. “Trends in Private   Investment Spending in  Developing Countries: Statistics for 1970-2000,” Working Paper No. 44. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, International Finance CorporationGranger, C.W.J. and Newbold, P. 1974. “Spurious Regression in Econometrics” Journal of  Econometrics 2: 111-120.Gregory, A.W. and B.E. Hansen. 1996. “Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime and Trend shifts.” Journal of Econometrics 70, 1: 99-126.Hakkio,Craig S., and Mark Rush. 1991. “Cointegration: How short is the long run?” Journal of  International Money and Finance, 10 (December): 571-81.Harris, Richard. 1995. Using Cointegration Analysis in Econometric Modelling. New York: Prentice-Hall.Johansen, Soren and K. Juselius. 1990. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Applications to the Demand for Money.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52 (May): 169-210.Jones, Charles I. 2011. Introduction to Economic Growth. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.Kahn, M.S. and C. M. Reinhart. 1990. “Private Investment and Economic Growth in Developing Countries.” World Development, 18 (January): 19-27.Killick, T. 1995. IMF Programmes in Developing Countries. London: Routledge.Kwaitkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P., and Shin, Y., 1992. “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root,” Journal of Econometrics, 54: 159-78.Lee, J. and M.C. Strazicich. 2003. “Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85 (4): 1082-1089.Maia, Jose L. and M. Kweitel, 2003. “Argentina: Sustainable Output Growth After the  Collapse,” Working Paper. Buenos Aires: Direccion Nacional de Politicas Macroeconomicas, Ministerio de Economia.Moguillansky, Graciela. 1996. “The Macroeconomic Context and Investment: Latin America since 1980.” Cepal Review, 58 (April): 79-94.Nelson, C., and C. Plosser. 1982. “Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Some Empirical Evidence and Implications.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, 1982: 139-162.Perron, P. 1988. "Trends and Random Walks in Macro-economic Time Series Further Evidence From A New Approach, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 297-332.Ram, R. and Zhang, K.H., 2002. “Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: Evidence from Cross Country Data for the 1990s,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 51: 205-215.Ramirez, Miguel D. 2019. “A FMOLS Analysis of FDI Flows to Latin America,” Applied Economics and Finance, 6 (2): 86-98.Ramirez, Miguel D. 2010. “Are Foreign and Public Capital Productive in the Mexican Case? A  Panel Unit Root and Panel Cointegration Analysis,” Eastern Economic Journal, 36 (1): 70-87.Ramirez, Miguel D. 2002. “Public Capital Formation and Labor Productivity Growth in Mexico,” Atlantic Economic Journal, 30 (4): 366-379.Rodrik, D. 1999. The New Global Economy and Developing Countries: Making Openness Work. Washington, D.C.: Overseas Development Council.Serven, L. and A. Solimano1993. “Economic Adjustment and Investment Performance in Developing Countries: The Experience of the 1980s,” in Strategies for Growth After Adjustment. The Role of Capital Formation. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Sen, A. 2003. “On Unit Root Tests when the Alternative is a Trend Break Stationary Process,”  Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 21: 174-184.Shiller, Robert J., and P. Perron. 1985. “Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis: Power versus Frequency of Observation,” Economic Letters, 18: 381-6.Stiglitz, J., 2003. “Whither Reform? Towards a New Agenda for Latin America,” Cepal Review, No. 80, August: 7-38.Stiglitz, J. 2012. The Price of Inequality. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Taylor, Lance. 1997. “The Revival of the Liberal Creed--the IMF and the World Bank in a Globalized Economy.” World Development, 25 (February): 145-152.Waheed, M., A. Tasneen, and G. Saghir. 2006. “Structural Breaks and Unit Roots: Evidence  from Pakistani Macroeconomic Time Series,” Munich Personal RePec Archive, Paper No. 1797 (December): 1-18.Weisbrot, M., A. Cibils, and D. Kar., 2002. “Argentina Since Default: The IMF and the Depression,” Center for Economic and Policy Research, Briefing Paper (September): 1-25.Weisbrot and Sandoval, 2007. “Argentina’s Economic Recovery: Policy Choices and  Implications,” Center for Economic and Policy Research, Briefing Paper (December): 1- 20.Weisbrot, M. 2011. “The Argentine Success Story and Its Implications.”Center for Economic Policy and Research, Briefing Paper (October): 1-23.  Weisbrot, M. and L. Merling, 2018. “Argentina’s Deal with the IMF: Will “Expansionary Austerity” Work?” Center for Economic Policy and Research, Briefing Paper (October): 1-23.    World Bank (2018). World Development Indicators, Argentina. Washington, D.C.  https://data.worldbank.org/country/argentinaUnited Nations. 2011-12. World Investment Reports 2011-12: Trends and Determinants.  Switzerland: United Nations.Zivot, E. and D. Andrews. 1992. “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the   Unit Root Hypothesis,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10: 251

Taylor Principle under Inflation Targeting in Emerging ASEAN Economies: GMM and DSGE Approaches

Hiroyuki Taguchi, Kenichi Tamegawa and Mesa Wanasilp

Correspondence: Hiroyuki Taguchi, htaguchi@mail.saitama-u.ac.jp

Saitama University, Japan

pdf (1176.06 Kb) | doi: https://doi.org/10.47260/bae/723

Abstract

This paper aims to reassess the performances of inflation targeting adopted by emerging ASEAN countries, Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand, by examining their monetary policy rules, both through generalized-method-of-moments (GMM) estimations of policy reaction functions and through Bayesian estimations of the New Keynesian dynamic-stochastic-general-equilibrium (DSGE) model. The main findings are summarized as follows. First, the GMM estimations identified inflation-responsive rules fulfilling the Taylor principle, with a forward-looking manner in Indonesia and Thailand and with a contemporaneous way in the Philippines. Second, the Bayesian estimations of the New Keynesian DSGE could reassure the GMM estimation results, as the former estimations produced consistent outcomes with the latter ones on the policy rate reactions to inflation with the Taylor principle.

Keywords:

  Taylor principle; Inflation targeting; Emerging ASEAN; Generalized method of moments (GMM); New Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model


References

An, S. and F. Schorfheide (2007) “Bayesian Analysis of DSGE Models” Econometric Reviews 26, 113-172.Belke, A. and T. Polleit (2007) “How the ECB and the US Fed set interest rates” Applied Economics 39(17), 2197-2209.Belke, A. and Y. Cui (2010) “US-Euro Area Monetary Policy Interdependence: New Evidence from Taylor Rule-based VECMs” World Economy 33(5), 778-797.Botzen, W.J.W. and P.S. Marey (2010) “Did the ECB respond to the stock market before the crisis?” Journal of Policy Modeling 32(3), 303-322.Calvo, G.A. (1983) “Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework” Journal of Monetary Economics 12, 383-398.Calvo, G.A. and C. Reinhart (2002) “Fear of floating” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(2), 379–408.Clarida, R., J. Gali and M. Gertler (1998a) “Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Theory and some evidence” NBER Working Paper Series No. 6442.Clarida, R., J. Gali and M. Gertler (1998b) “Monetary policy rules in practice: Some international evidence” European Economic Review 42(6), 1033-1067.Clarida, R. and M. Gertler (1997) “How the Bundesbank conducts monetary policy” In Reducing inflation, University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Christiano, L.J., M. Eichenbaum and C.L. Evans (2005) “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy” Journal of Political Economy 113, 1-45.Eichengreen, B. (2002) “Can emerging markets float? Should they inflation target?” Working Paper (Banco Central do Brazil) No.36.Gali, J (2008) Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle: An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework, Princeton University Press: Princeton and Oxford.Heimonen, K., J. Junttila and S. Kärkkäinen (2017) “Stock market and exchange rate information in the Taylor rule: Evidence from OECD countries” International Review of Economics and Finance 51, 1-18.Ito, T. and T. Hayashi (2004) “Inflation targeting in Asia” Occasional Paper (Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research) No. 1.Kydland, F. and E. Prescott (1982) “Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations” Econometrica 50(6), 1345-1370.Lueangwilai, K. (2012) “Monetary policy rules and exchange rate uncertainty: A structural investigation in Thailand” Procedia Economics and Finance 2, 325–334.Mankiw, N.G. (2016) Macroeconomics (9th Edition), Worth Publishers: New York.Mishkin, F.S. (2000) “Inflation targeting in emerging market countries” American Economic Review 90(2), 105–109.Mishkin, F.S. and A.S. Posen (1998) “Inflation targeting: Lessons from four countries” NBER Working Paper Series No. 6126.Mishkin, F.S. and K. Schmidt-Hebbel (2007) “Does inflation targeting make a difference?” NBER Working Paper Series No. 12876.Papadamou, S., M. Sidiropoulos and A. Vidra (2018) “A Taylor Rule for EU members. Does one rule fit to all EU member needs?” Journal of Economic Asymmetries 18, e00104.Smets, F. and R. Wouters (2003) “An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the euro area,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 20, pp. 1123- 1175.Smets, F. and R. Wouters (2007) “Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian Approach” The American Economic Review 97(3), 586-606.Taguchi, H. and C. Kato (2011) “Assessing the performance of inflation targeting in East Asian economies” Asian-Pacific Economic Literature 25(1), 93–102.Wimanda, R.E., P.M. Turner and M.J.B. Hall (2011) “Expectations and the inertia of inflation: The case of Indonesia” Journal of Policy Modeling 33(3), 426–438.

Option Pricing: Channels, Target Zones and Sideways Markets

Zura Kakushadze

Correspondence: Zura Kakushadze, zura@quantigic.com

Quantigic Solutions LLC, USA

pdf (1176.06 Kb) | doi: https://doi.org/10.47260/bae/722

Abstract

After a market downturn, especially in an uncertain economic environment such as the current state, there can be a relatively long period with a sideways market, where indexes, stocks, etc., move in channels with support and resistance levels. We discuss option pricing in such scenarios, in both cases of unattainable as well as attainable boundaries, and obtain closed-form option pricing formulas. Our results also apply to FX rates in target zones without interest rate pegging (USD/HKD, digital currencies, etc.).

Keywords:

  Option pricing, channel, reflecting boundaries, Brownian motion, volatility, drift, barriers, mean-reversion, mean-repelling, FX, digital currencies, target zone, sideways market, interest rate, attainable boundaries, unattainable boundaries, arbitrage, stock, put, call, binary, knockout, rebate.


References

Baxter, M. and Rennie, A. (1996) Financial Calculus: An Introduction to Derivative Pricing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Beaglehole, D. (1992) Down and Out, Up and In Options. Working Paper. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa.Bhagavatula, R. and P. Carr (1995) Valuing Double Barrier Options with Time-dependent Parameters. Working Paper. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Broadie, M. and Detemple, J. (1995) American Capped Call Options on Dividend-Paying Assets. Review of Financial Studies 8(1): 161-191.Carr, P. (1995) Two extensions to barrier option valuation. Applied Mathematical Finance 2(3): 173-209.Carr, P. (2017) Bounded Brownian Motion. Risks 5(4): 61.Carr, P. and Kakushadze, Z. (2017) FX Options in Target Zones. Quantitative Finance 17(10): 1477-1486. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2699250.Geman, H. and Yor, M. (1996) Pricing and Hedging Double-Barrier Options: A Probabilistic Approach. Mathematical Finance 6(4): 365-378.Harrison, J.M. and Pliska, S.R. (1981) Martingales and stochastic integrals in the theory of continuous trading. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 11(3): 215-260.Haug, E.G. (2007) The Complete Guide to Option Pricing Formulas. (2nd ed.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Hui, C.C. (1996) One-touch double barrier binary option values. Applied Financial Economic 6(4): 343-346.Hull, J.C. (2012) Options, Futures and Other Derivatives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Kakushadze, Z. (2015) Phynance. Universal Journal of Physics and Application 9(2): 64-133. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2433826.Kakushadze, Z. (2019) Healthy… Distress… Default. Journal of Risk & Control 6(1): 113-119. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3444620.Kakushadze, Z. and Yu, W. (2019) iCurrency? World Economics 20(4): 151-175. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3444445.Kunitomo, N. and Ikeda, M. (1992) Pricing Options with Curved Boundaries. Mathematical Finance 2(4): 275-298.Madan, D.B. (2017) Pricing options on mean reverting underliers. Quantitative Finance 17(4): 497-513.

Targeting Poverty and Developing Sustainable Development Objectives for the United Nation’s Countries using a Systematic Approach Combining DRSA and Multiple Linear Regressions

Jean-Charles Marin, Bryan B-Trudel, Kazimierz Zaras and Mamadou Sylla

Correspondence: Jean-Charles Marin, jcmarin2@me.com

Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Canada

pdf (1176.06 Kb) | doi: https://doi.org/10.47260/bae/721

Abstract

The objectives of this article is to target poverty using Dominance-based Rough Set Approach (DRSA) to help the United Nation’s Countries develop objectives for sustainable development. There are 12 variables divided into 2 perspectives. The first is an economical and technological perspective composed of 6 variables. The second is a sociological and political perspective composed of 6 variables. The methodology proposed classifies all the United Nation’s countries according to three different categories: [A] Developed countries; [B] Emerging economies that need support to acquire category A status; [C] Under Developed countries ranked the lowest and needing special support with regard to the criterion or criteria considered. Using this classification, DRSA provides decision rules to explain the classification and indicating precisely what are the conditions to be part of a higher category. Also, the results indicate what are the conditions to be part of the Under Developed countries category and therefore helps targeting poverty and proposing, at the same time, objectives to improve this classification. Finally, we used Multiple Linear Regressions with selected decision rules to test selected decision rules as the Gross National Income per capita as the dependent variable.

Keywords:

  International development, United Nations States, International aid, Economic growth, Strategic objectives, Sustainable Development.


References

Boudreau-Trudel, B., Marin, JC., Zaras, K. (2018) « Idenfifying Strategic Development Objectives for African Countries with an Approach for International Development Using Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach: The Poverty String Theory », Modern Economy, vol. 9.CPIA database 2018 World Bank, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IQ.CPA.TRAN.XQ?view=chart>.Emam, O., Farhan, M., Abohany, A. (2017) Faults Repairing Analysis Using Rough Sets after Implementation of Labor Force Redistribution Algorithm: A case Study in Telecom Egypt, Information Sciences Letter, 6, No. 3, 39-48.Grego, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R. (1999) The Use of Rough Sets and Fuzzy Sets in MCDM, Advances in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, 14.1-14.59.Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, J. Stefanowski (2000) An Algorithm for Induction of Decision Rules Consistent with the Dominance Principle, Conference: Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, Second International Conference, RSCTC 2000, Canada, October, 16-19Greco, S., Matarazzo, B. and Słowiński, R. (2001) Rough Sets Theory for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. European, Journal of Operational Research, 129, 1-47.Ho, H., Fann, W., Chiang, H., Nguyen, P., Pham, D., Nguyen, P., and Nagai, M. (2016) Application of Rough Set, GSM and MSM to Analyze Learning Outcome—An Example Introduction to Education, Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 8, 23-38.International Institute for Strategic Studies 2018. http://maps.visionofhumanity.org/#page/indexes/global-peace-index/2017.Marin, J., Zaras, K. and Boudreau-Trudel, B. (2014) Use of the Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach as a Decision Aid Tool for the Selection of Development Projects in Northern Quebec, Modern Economy, 5, 723-741.Marin, J.C., Trudel, B. Zaras, K. (2019) “Defining Poverty Using DBRSA and Proposing Strategic Objectives for the United Nations Developing Countries”, Modern Economy, vol. 10, pp. 547-573.Pawlak, Z. (1982) Rough Set. International Journal of Parallel Programming, 11, 341-356.Pawlak, Z. (1991) Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3534-4Pawlak, Z. and Slowinski, R. (1994) Rough Set Approach to Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 72, 443-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90415-4Pawlak, Z. (2002) Rough Set Theory and Its Applications. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Theory, 3,7-10.Prema S. and Umamaheswari, P. (2016) Multitude Classifier Using Rough Set Jelinek-Mercer Naïve Bayes for Disease Diagnosis”, Circuits and Systems, 7, 701-708.Renaud, J., Thibault, J., Lanouette, R., Kiss, L.,N, Zaras, K. and Fonteix, C. (2007) Comparison of Two Multi-Criteria Methods: Net Flow and Rough Set Methods for aid to Decision Making in a High Yield Pulping Process, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 177, no.3, 1418-1432.Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (2001) International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Elsevier. Oxford Science Ltd.Songbian Z. (2016) Business Intelligence from Customer Review Management Using Rough Set Model, International Journal of Advanced Research, 4, 816-824.The Economist 2018, The Intelligence Unit,  http://maps.visionofhumanity.org/#page/indexes/global-peace-index/2017Transparency International (2018). https//www.transparency.orgUnited Nations (2018) UN Data. http://data.un.org/Explorer.aspx?d=UNODCWagle, U. (2002) « Rethinking Poverty: Definition and Measurement », International Social Science Journal, Volume 54, page 155-165.World Bank (2018) Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/indicatorZaras, K. (2004) Rough Approximation of a Preference Relation by a Multi-Attribute Stochastic Dominance for Deterministic, Stochastic and Fuzzy Evaluation Problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 159, 196-206.Zaras, K., Marin, J.-C. and Boudreau-Trudel, B. (2012) Dominance Rough Set Approach as a Decision-Making Method for the Selection of Sustainable Development Projects. American Journal of Operational Research, 2, 506.Transparency International (2018). https//www.transparency.org 

The Econophysics of Labor Income

Nikolaos Papanikolaou

Correspondence: Nikolaos Papanikolaou, nikolaos.papanikolaou@lehman.cuny.edu

Lehman College, Bronx, New York, USA

pdf (1176.06 Kb) | doi:

Abstract

This paper examines the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey (CPS) of full-time wage and salary workers to determine the underlying functional form of the size distribution of income from 1996 to 2008. There has been a lot of attention on income inequality Pre and Post Great Recession of 2008-2009. This paper applies the tools developed in a new field of economics called Econophysics. The analysis uses parametric and nonparametric methods to determine the size distribution of wage and salary income. The findings suggest that the underlying functional form of labor income is approximately distributed as an exponential distribution, while non-labor income is underscored by a Pareto distribution.

Keywords:

  Size Distribution of Labor Income, Income Inequality, Boltzmann-Gibbs Distribution, Optimal Bandwidth, Kernel Density Estimator, Census Bureau, Exponential Distribution, Pareto Distribution.


References

Balakrishnan N. and A.P. Basu. (1996). Exponential Distribution: Theory, Methods and Applications. CRC Press, First (Ed.).Burkhauser, R.C., SFeng, S.P. Jenkins and J. Larrimore. (2008). Estimating Trends in US Income Inequality using Current Population Survey: The Importance of Controlling for Censoring. Center for Economics Studies (CES) Research Paper.Chatterjee A. and S. Yarlagadda, & B. K. Chakrabarti. (2008). Econophysics of Wealth Distributions, Springer.Cockshott W.P. and A.F. Cottrell and G.J. Michaelson and I.P Wright and V.M. Yakovenko. (2009). Classical Econophysics. Routledge advances in experimental and computable economics, No. 12.Dragulescu, A.A. and V.M. Yakovenko. (2000). Statistical Mechanics of Money. The European Physical Journal B 17, 723-729.Dragulescu A.A and V.M. Yakovenko. (2001a). Exponential and power-law probability distributions of wealth and income in the United Kingdom and the United States. Physica A, vol. 299, pp. 213–221.Dragulescu A.A. and V.M. Yakovenko. (2001b). Evidence for the exponential distribution of income in the USA,” The European Physical Journal B, vol. 20, pp.585-589.Guerello, Chiara, (2018). Conventional and unconventional monetary policy vs. households income distribution: An empirical analysis for the Euro Area, Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 187-214.Jones, M.C. and Marron, J. S. Marron and Sheather, S.J. (1996). A Brief Survey of Bandwidth Selection for Density Estimation (1996). Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 91, No. 433 (Mar., 1996), pp.401-407.Kleiber C. and S.K. (2003). Statistical Size Distribution in Economics and Actuarial Sciences. WILEY-INERSCIENCE, Chapter 1, pp. 1-19.Levy, M. and Solomon, S. (1997). Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 242, issue 1, 90-94.Madrick, J. & Papanikolaou, N. (2010). The stagnation of male wages in the US, International Review of Applied Economics, 24:3, 309-318.Mandelbrot B.B. (1960). The Pareto-Levy Law and the Distribution of Income. International Economic Review, vol. 1, pp.79-106.Mandelbrot B.B. (1963). New Methods in Statistical Economics. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 71, pp. 421-440, 1963.Mumtaz, H., & Theophilopoulou, A. (2017). The impact of monetary policy on inequality in the UK. An empirical analysis. European Economic Review, 98, 410-423.Papanikolaou, N. (2020). Markov-Switching Model of Family Income Quintile Shares, Atlantic Economic Journal. (pending publication vol. 48, issue 1).Pareto V. (1897). Cours d’Economie Politique. Lausanne.Pfeffer, F. T., Danziger, S., & Schoeni, R. F. (2013). Wealth Disparities before and after the Great Recession. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 650(1), 98–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716213497452Saiki, A., & Frost, J. (2014). Does unconventional monetary policy affect inequality? Evidence from Japan. Applied Economics, 46(36), 4445-4454Shaikh, A., Papanikolaou, N., and Wiener, N. (2014), Race, gender and the econophysics of income distribution in the USA, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 415, issue C, p. 54-60.Silva, A.C. and V.M. Yakovenko. (2005a). Temporal Evolution of the “Thermal” and “Superthermal” Income Classes in the USA during 1983-2001. Europhysics Letter 69, 304-310.Silva A.C. and V.M. Yakovenko. (2005b). Two-Class Structure of Income Distribution in the USA: Exponential Bulk and Power-Law Tail. In Chatterjee, Yarlagadda, and Chakrabarti, Econophysics of Wealth Distributions, pp. 15-23.Sima Siami‐Namini, Conrad Lyford and A. Alexandre Trindade. (2020). The Effects of Monetary Policy Shocks on Income Inequality Across U.S. States, Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy, 10.1111/1759-3441.12279.Silverman B.W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability Series.Smith, Adam. (1776). The Wealth of Nations. (Ed.) Edwin Cannan (1937), Modern Library, New York.Souma W. (2001). Universal Structure of the Personal Income Distribution, Fractals. World Scientific Publishing Co., Vol. 9, No. 3.Souma W. (2002). Physics of Personal Income. ATR Human Information Science Laboratories, Kyoto, Japan.Tarozzi A. (2009). A primer in density estimation. ECON 214 Lecture Notes, http://econ.duke.edu/~taroz/LectureNotes214NP.pdfWalras, L. (1899). Éléments d'économie politique pure (1899), 4th ed.; 1926, éd. définitive), in English, Elements of Pure Economics (1954), trans. William Jaffé.Yakovenko, V.M. (2009). Econophysics, Statistical Mechanics Approach to. In R.A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Complexity and System Science. Springer.Yakovenko V.M. and J.B. Rosser (2009). Colloquium: Statistical Mechanics of Money, Wealth, and Income, Econophysics. Review of Modern Physics, vol. 81, pp. 1703-1725.

Productivity, efficiency and firm’s market value: Microeconomic evidence from multinational corporations

Panayiotis Tzeremes

Correspondence: Panayiotis Tzeremes, tzeremes@econ.uth.gr

Department of Economics, University of Thessaly, Greece

pdf (1176.06 Kb) | doi:

Abstract

The paper proposes a conditional range directional distance estimator by modifying the range directional distance model utilizing the probabilistic characterization of directional distance functions (DDF). Moreover, as an illustrative example the paper applies the proposed estimator on a sample of 89 multinational corporations for the period 2006-2012. The paper examines the effect of firms’ market value on their estimated operational performance levels. Inefficiency measures are estimated over the examined period. The results reveal a nonlinear (U-shape) relationship between firms’ market value and their operating efficiency levels. Finally, the analysis from applying the local linear estimator reveals that lower market values are associated with higher operating inefficiencies, whereas, higher market values are associated with higher operating efficiencies.

Keywords:

  Productivity, Firm’ production, Efficiency, Market value, Microeconomic analysis


References

Akther, S., Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2013). Estimating two-stage network slacks-based inefficiency: An application to Bangladesh banking. Omega, 41(1), 88-96.Asmild, M., & Pastor, J. T. (2010). Slack free MEA and RDM with comprehensive efficiency measures. Omega, 38(6), 475-483.Avkiran, N. K. (2009). Removing the impact of environment with units-invariant efficient frontier analysis: An illustrative case study with intertemporal panel data. Omega, 37(3), 535-544.Bădin, L., Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2010). Optimal bandwidth selection for conditional efficiency measures: A data-driven approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 633-640.Barros, C. P., Managi, S., & Matousek, R. (2012). The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks: non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output. Omega, 40(1), 1-8.Bogetoft, P., & Hougaard, J. L. (1999). Efficiency evaluations based on potential (non-proportional) improvements. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 12(3), 233-247.Cazals, C., Florens, J. P., & Simar, L. (2002). Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach. Journal of econometrics, 106(1), 1-25.Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1996). Benefit and distance functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 70(2), 407-419.Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1998). Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 98(2), 351-364.Chen, Y. (2004). Ranking efficient units in DEA. Omega, 32(3), 213-219.Chen, Y., Du, J., & Huo, J. (2013). Super-efficiency based on a modified directional distance function. Omega, 41(3), 621-625.Chung, Y. H., Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach Journal of Environmental Management, 51(3), 229-240.Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2005). Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: a probabilistic approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 24(1), 93-121.Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2006). A robust nonparametric approach to evaluate and explain the performance of mutual funds. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 516-542.Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2007). Conditional nonparametric frontier models for convex and nonconvex technologies: a unifying approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(1-2), 13-32.Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2009). A comment on weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(2), 535-538.Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2013). DEA, directional distance functions and positive, affine data transformation. Omega, 41(1), 28-30.Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka Jr, C. A. (2007a). Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy, 32(7), 1055-1066.Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka Jr, C. A. (2007b). Pollution abatement activities and traditional productivity. Ecological Economics, 62(3-4), 673-682.Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka Jr, C. A. (2010). Toxic releases: an environmental performance index for coal-fired power plants. Energy Economics, 32(1), 158-165.Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka, C. A. (2006). Social responsibility: US power plants 1985–1998. Journal of Productivity analysis, 26(3), 259-267.Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90-98.Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 120(3), 253-281.Hall, P., Racine, J., & Li, Q. (2004). Cross-validation and the estimation of conditional probability densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99(468), 1015-1026.Hughes, J. P., Lang, W., Moon, C. G., & Pagano, M. S. (1997). Measuring the efficiency of capital allocation in commercial banking. Working paper no. 98-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA.Jeong, S. O., Park, B. U., & Simar, L. (2010). Nonparametric conditional efficiency measures: asymptotic properties. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 105-122.Johnson, A. L., & Kuosmanen, T. (2011). One-stage estimation of the effects of operational conditions and practices on productive performance: asymptotically normal and efficient, root-n consistent StoNEZD method. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36(2), 219-230.Johnson, A. L., & Kuosmanen, T. (2012). One-stage and two-stage DEA estimation of the effects of contextual variables. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(2), 559-570.Kao, C., & Hung, H. T. (2007). Management performance: An empirical study of the manufacturing companies in Taiwan. Omega, 35(2), 152-160.Kuosmanen, T. (2005). Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis with undesirable outputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(4), 1077-1082.Kuosmanen, T. (2012). Stochastic semi-nonparametric frontier estimation of electricity distribution networks: Application of the StoNED method in the Finnish regulatory model. Energy Economics, 34(6), 2189-2199.Kuosmanen, T., & Matin, R. K. (2011). Duality of weakly disposable technology. Omega, 39(5), 504-512.Kuosmanen, T., & Podinovski, V. (2009). Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis: reply to Färe and Grosskopf. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(2), 539-545.Li, Q., & Racine, J. (2004). Cross-validated local linear nonparametric regression. Statistica Sinica, 485-512.Li, Q., & Racine, J. S. (2007). Nonparametric econometrics: theory and practice. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.Luenberger, D. G. (1992). Benefit functions and duality. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 21(5), 461-481.Luenberger, D. G. (1994). Optimality and the theory of value. Journal of Economic Theory, 63(2), 147-169.Luo, X. (2003). Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business Research, 56(8), 627-635.McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595-612.Mehran, H. (1995). Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 38(2), 163-184.Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.Portela, M. S., Thanassoulis, E., & Simpson, G. (2004). Negative data in DEA: A directional distance approach applied to bank branches. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(10), 1111-1121.Racine, J. (1997). Consistent significance testing for nonparametric regression. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 15(3), 369-378.Racine, J. S. (2008). Nonparametric econometrics: A primer. Foundations and Trends® in Econometrics, 3(1), 1-88.Racine, J. S., Hart, J., & Li, Q. (2006). Testing the significance of categorical predictor variables in nonparametric regression models. Econometric Reviews, 25(4), 523-544.Racine, J., & Li, Q. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of regression functions with both categorical and continuous data. Journal of Econometrics, 119(1), 99-130.Ramanathan, R., & Yunfeng, J. (2009). Incorporating cost and environmental factors in quality function deployment using data envelopment analysis. Omega, 37(3), 711-723.Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270-1288.Simar, L., & Vanhems, A. (2012). Probabilistic characterization of directional distances and their robust versions. Journal of Econometrics, 166(2), 342-354.Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 31-64.Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15-29.Wang, C. H., Lu, Y. H., Huang, C. W., & Lee, J. Y. (2013). R&D, productivity, and market value: An empirical study from high-technology firms. Omega, 41(1), 143-155.Zelenyuk, V. (2013). A scale elasticity measure for directional distance function and its dual: Theory and DEA estimation. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(3), 592-600.

Foreign Aid Loans and Economic Growth in Vietnam

Hiroaki Sakurai

Correspondence: Hiroaki Sakurai, hsakurai@shonan.bunkyo.ac.jp

Bunkyo University, Japan

pdf (1176.06 Kb) | doi:

Abstract

This paper examines the productivity of foreign aid in Vietnam, in two ways. First, the effect of foreign aid upon economic growth in Vietnam as a whole is studied using time series data from 1994 to 2017. Second, the effect of the yen loan, or governmental aid loan from Japan, in 34 provinces out of 63 is studied using panel data from 2001 to 2016. The effect of foreign aid is still uncertain, and the aim is to clarify it. Two points are found. First, no effect of foreign aid to Vietnam has been found using the time series data for the entire country. Second, the increase in productivity due to the yen loan has not been estimated, either. Although the impact from the foreign aid to the economic growth is not estimated, it may include Vietnamese special reasons. Since the main portion of foreign aid to Vietnam came after 1994, most infrastructure facilities are contributing relatively in a short term. This finding is likely to change in future, since infrastructure established recently with the loan will continue to contribute to economic growth in Vietnam.

Keywords:

  Foreign Aid, Productivity, Vietnam


References

Aschauer, D. A. (1989) “Is Public Expenditure Productive?” Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2), 177-200.Arndt, C., Jones, S., and Tarp, F. (2015) “Assessing Foreign Aid’s Long-Run Contribution to Growth and Development,” World Development, 69, 6-18.Burnside, C., and Dollar, D. (2000) “Aid, Policies, and Growth,” American Economic Review, 90(4), 847-868.Chung, V. V. (2015). Foreign Capital Inflows and Economic Growth: Does Foreign Capital Inflows Promote the Host Country’s Economic Growth? An Empirical Case Study of Vietnam and the Intuitive Roles of Japan’s Capital Inflows on Vietnam’s Economic Growth, Visiting Scholar Workshop Material, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance, Government of Japan.Easterly, W., Levine, R., and Roodman, D. (2004) “New Data, New Doubts: Comment on ‘Aid, Policies and Growth (2000)’ by Burnside and Dollar,” American Economic Review, 94(3), 774-780.Easterly, W. (2006) The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. New York: Penguin Press.Easterly, W. (2007) “Was Development Assistance a Mistake?” American Economic Review, 97(2), 328-332.Kimura, H., and Todo, Y. (2010) “Is Foreign Aid a Vanguard of Foreign Direct Investment? A Gravity-Equation Approach,” World Development, 38(4), 482-497.Miyagawa, T., Kawasaki, K., and Edamura, K. (2013) “Reexamination of the Productivity of Public Capital,” Economic Review, Hitotsubashi University, 64(3), 240-255. (in Japanese)Nowak-Lehmann, F., Dreher, A., Herzer, D., Klasen, S., and Martinez-Zaroso, I. (2012) “Does Foreign Aid Really Raise per capita Income? A Time Series Perspective,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 45(1), 288-313.Salaya, P., and Thiele, R. (2010) “Aid and Sectoral Growth: Evidence from Panel Data,” Journal of Development Studies, 46(10), 1749-1766.Taguchi, H. and Pham, K.H. (2019) “Economic Effects of Inward Foreign Direct Investment: The case of Vietnamese Provinces,” Journal of Advanced Studies in Finance,10(1), 9-21.

Expectations about Unreported Output, Bank Lending and Double-Cycle Stability Policy

Erotokritos Varelas

Correspondence: Erotokritos Varelas, varelas@uom.edu.gr

University of Macedonia, Greece

pdf (1176.06 Kb) | doi:

Abstract

This article argues that the possibility there can be output unreported to the authorities, prompts expectations about the size of this output which can destabilize increasingly an economy experiencing otherwise a uniform oscillation. It follows logically that the “stability” of uniform fluctuations will be preserved if the policy maker aims at such fluctuations in unreported output too, but of exactly opposite direction (“double cycle” hypothesis), lessening in effect the fluctuation of overall output as well. The economy is one modeled in terms of the interplay between its banking sector and the government budget. Our conclusions hold independently of the source of unreported output allowing thus one to identify for analytical convenience this output with everything the term connotes except tax evasion. Assuming that borrower-lender asymmetric information leads to a fraction only of bank lending to be financing capital change, instability becomes a matter of the expectations about this fraction too, about credit rationing; much more so when the capital change involves both sectors of the economy. The link between the two types of expectations is that they are both shaped by the stage of the business cycle, making the “double cycle” target attainable by means of the manipulation of “lending” or the same, credit-rationing expectations. The introduction of money or bank industry structure into the analysis does not appear to alter these conclusions; nor does the examination of the subject in terms of labor in the place of capital ̶ examination enabled analytically through the use of a CES production function.

Keywords:

  Unreported output, expectations, banking, government budget, double cycle, stability


References

Ardizzi, Guerino, Carmelo Petraglia, Massimiliano Piacenza and Gilberto Turati (2012), “Measuring the Underground Economy with the Currency Demand Approach: A Reinterpretation of the Methodology, with an Application to Italy”, Bank of Italy Working Paper 864. https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/temi-discussione/2012/2012-0864/en_tema_864.pdfAuriol, Emmanuelle and Michel Warlters (2005), Taxation Base in Developing Countries, Journal of Public Economics, 89, 625-646.Beck, Thorsten, Asli Demirgüç-Kunt and María Soledad Martínez Pería (2011), “Bank Financing for SMEs around the World: Drivers, Obstacles, Business Models, and Lending Practices”, Journal of Financial Services Research, 39(1-2), 35-54.Blinder, Alan S. (1987), “Credit Rationing and Effective Supply Failures”, Economic Journal, 97(386), 327-352.Capasso, Salvatore, Stefano Monferrà and Gabriele Sampagnaro (2015), “The Shadow Economy and Banks’ Lending Technology,” Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance Working Papers 422. http://www.csef.it/WP/wp422.pdfCasey, Eddie and Conor M. O’Toole (2014), “Bank-lending Constraints, Trade Credit and Alternative Financing during the Financial Crisis: Evidence from European SMEs”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 27(C), 173-193.Chiarini, Bruno and Elisabetta Marzano (2006), “Market Consumption and Hidden Consumption. A Test for Substitutability”, Applied Economics, 38(6), 707-716.Dabla‐Norris, Era and Andrew Feltenstein (2005), “The Underground Economy and its Macroeconomic Consequences”, Journal of Policy Reform, 8(2), 153-174.Distinguin, Isabelle, Clovis Rugemintwari and Ruth Tacneng (2016), “Can Informal Firms Hurt Registered SMEs’ Access to Credit?”, World Development, 84(C), 18-40.Feige, Edgar L. (1994), “The Underground Economy and the Currency Enigma”, Supplement to Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 49, 119-136Fernández, Andrés and Felipe Meza (2015), “Informal Employment and Business Cycles in Emerging Economies: The Case of Mexico”, Review of Economic Dynamics, 18(2), 381-405.Ferreira-Tiryaki, Gisele (2008), “The Informal Economy and Business Cycles”, Journal of Applied Economics, 11(1), 91-117.Frey, Bruno S. and Werner Pommerehne (1984), “The Hidden Economy: State and Prospect for Measurement”, Review of Income and Wealth, 30(1), 1-23.Giles, David E.A. (1997), “Testing for Asymmetry in the Measured and Underground Business Cycles in New Zealand”, Economic Record, 73(222), 225-232Gobbi, Giorgio and Roberta Zizza (2007), “Does the Underground Economy Hold Back Financial Deepening? Evidence from the Italian Credit Market”, Bank of Italy Working Paper 646. https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/temi-discussione/2007/2007-0646/en_tema_646.pdf?language_id=1Granda-Carvajal, Catalina (2010), “The Unofficial Economy and the Business Cycle: A Test for Theories”, International Economic Journal, 24(4), 573-586.Hasan, Iftekhar, Chun-Keung (Stan) Hoi, Qiang Wu and Hao Zhang (2014), “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The effect of corporate tax avoidance on the cost of bank loans”, Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper 3.  https://helda.helsinki.fi/bof/bitstream/handle/123456789/7940/172917.pdf?sequence=1Hill, Roderick (2002), “The Underground Economy in Canada: Boom or Bust?”, Canadian Tax Journal / Revue Fiscale Canadienne, 50(5), 1641-1654Ketchen Jr, David J., R. Duane Ireland and Justin W. Webb (2014), “Toward a Research Agenda for the Informal Economy: A Survey of the Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal’s Editorial Board”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(1), 95-100.Klette, Tor Jacob and Zvi Griliches (1996), “The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators when Output Prices are Unobserved and Endogenous”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(4), 343-361.McCarthy, Scott, Barry Oliver and Martie-Louise Verreynne (2017), “Bank financing and credit rationing of Australian SMEs”, Australian Journal of Management, 42(1), 58-85.Pickhardt, Michael and Jordi Sardà (2011), “Cash, Hoarding and the Underground Economy”, Center of Applied Economic Research Münster Working Paper 56.  https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/57172/1/689527926.pdfRestrepo-Echavarría, Paulina (2014), “Macroeconomic Volatility: The Role of the Informal Economy”, European Economic Review, 70(C), 454-469.Russo, Francesco Flaviano (2010), “Double Business Cycle: The Hidden Economy in the US”, Unpublished paper, Boston University, Department of Economics.Schneider, Friedrich and Dominik H. Enste (2000), “Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences”, Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77-114.Tanzi, Vito (1980), “The Underground Economy in the United States: Estimates and Implications”, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 135, 427-453.Werner, Richard A. (2013), “Towards a More Stable and Sustainable Financial Architecture – A Discussion and Application of the Quantity Theory of Credit”, Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 46(3), 357-387.Williams, Colin C. and Sara Nadin (2010), “Entrepreneurship and the Informal Economy: An Overview”, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 15(4), 361-378.

Machine Learning Treasury Yields

Zura Kakushadze and Willie Yu

Correspondence: Zura Kakushadze, zura@quantigic.com

Quantigic Solutions LLC, USA

pdf (1176.06 Kb) | doi:

Abstract

We give explicit algorithms and source code for extracting factors underlying Treasury yields using (unsupervised) machine learning (ML) techniques, such as nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) and (statistically deterministic) clustering. NMF is a popular ML algorithm (used in computer vision, bioinformatics/computational biology, document classification, etc.), but is often misconstrued and misused. We discuss how to properly apply NMF to Treasury yields. We analyze the factors based on NMF and clustering and their interpretation. We discuss their implications for forecasting Treasury yields in the context of out-of-sample ML stability issues.

Keywords:

  non-negative matrix factorization, NMF, clustering, k-means, Treasury, yield, machine learning, maturity, time series, out-of-sample, in-sample, weight, factor, exposure, source code, principal component, correlation, forecasting, interest rate, stability, level, slope, steepness, curvature, fixed income, term structure, yield curve.


References

Almeida, C., Ardison, K., Kubudi, D., Simonsen, A. and Vicente, J. (2018) Forecasting Bond Yields with Segmented Term Structure Models. Journal of Financial Econometrics 16(1): 1-33.Bliss, R.R. (1997) Movements in the Term Structure of Interest Rates. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review 82(4): 16-33.Bouchaud, J.-P. and Potters, M. (2011) Financial applications of random matrix theory: a short review. In: Akemann, G., Baik, J. and Di Francesco, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Random Matrix Theory. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Campbell, L.L. (1960) Minimum coefficient rate for stationary random processes. Information and Control 3(4): 360-371.Diebold, F.X. and Li, C. (2006) Forecasting the Term Structure of Government Bond Yields. Journal of Econometrics 130(2): 337-364.Ding, C., He, X. and Simon, H.D. (2005) On the equivalence of nonnegative matrix factorization and spectral clustering. In: Kargupta, H., Srivastava, J., Kamath, C. and Goodman, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), pp. 606-610.Duffee, G. (2002) Term premia and interest rate forecasts in affine models. Journal of Finance 57(1): 405-443.Duffee, G. (2013) Chapter 7 – Forecasting Interest Rates. In: Elliott, G. and Timmermann, A. (eds.) Handbook of Economic Forecasting. Vol. 2, Part A. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 385-426.Eckart, C. and Young, G. (1936) The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika 1(3): 211-218.Fama, E.F. and MacBeth, J.D. (1973) Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. Journal of Political Economy 81(3): 607-636.Forgy, E.W. (1965) Cluster analysis of multivariate data: efficiency versus interpretability of classifications. Biometrics 21(3): 768-769.Frobenius, G. (1912) Über Matrizen aus Nicht Negativen Elementen. In: Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, pp. 456-477.Gaujoux, R. and Seoighe, C. (2010). A flexible R package for nonnegative matrix factorization. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 367.Hartigan, J.A. (1975) Clustering Algorithms. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Hartigan, J.A. and Wong, M.A. (1979) Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics) 28(1): 100-108.Kakushadze, Z. (2015) Heterotic Risk Models. Wilmott Magazine 2015(80): 40-55. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2600798.Kakushadze, Z. and Yu, W. (2016a) Factor Models for Cancer Signatures. Physica A 462: 527-559. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2772458.Kakushadze, Z. and Yu, W. (2016b) Statistical Industry Classification. Journal of Risk & Control 3(1): 17-65. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2802753.Kakushadze, Z. and Yu, W. (2017a) Statistical Risk Models. Journal of Investment Strategies 6(2): 1-40. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2732453.Kakushadze, Z. and Yu, W. (2017b) *K-means and Cluster Models for Cancer Signatures. Biomolecular Detection and Quantification 13: 7-31. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2908286.Kakushadze, Z. and Yu, W. (2017c) Mutation Clusters from Cancer Exome. Genes 8(8): 201. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2945010.Knez, P., Litterman, R.B. and Scheinkman, J. (1994) Explorations into Factors Explaining Money Market Returns. Journal of Finance 49(5): 1861-1882.Lee, D.D. and Seung, H.S. (1999) Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401(6755): 788-791. Litterman, R.B. and Scheinkman, J. (1991) Common factors affecting bond returns. Journal of Fixed Income 1(1): 54-61.Lloyd, S.P. (1957) Least square quantization in PCM. Working Paper. Murray Hill, NJ: Bell Telephone Laboratories.Lloyd, S.P. (1982) Least square quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 28(2): 129-137.MacQueen, J.B. (1967) Some Methods for classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations. In: LeCam, L. and Neyman, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 281-297.Nelson, C. and Siegel, A.F. (1987) Parsimonious modeling of yield curves. Journal of Business 60(4): 473-489.Paatero, P. and Tapper, U. (1994) Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error. Environmetrics 5(1): 111-126. Perron, O. (1907) Zur Theorie der Matrices. Mathematische Annalen 64(2): 248-263.Roy, O. and Vetterli, M. (2007) The effective rank: A measure of effective dimensionality. In: European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO). Poznań, Poland (September 3-7, 2007), pp. 606-610.Shahnaz, F., Berry, M.W., Pauca, V.P. and Plemmons, R.J. (2006) Document clustering using nonnegative matrix factorization. Information Processing and Management 42(2): 373-386.Steinhaus, H. (1957) Sur la division des corps matériels en parties. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 4(12): 801-804.Svensson, L.E.O. (1994) Estimating and interpreting forward interest rates: Sweden 1992-1994. NBER Working Paper No. 4871. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Takada, H. H. and Stern, J.M. (2015) Non-negative matrix factorization and term structure of interest rates. AIP Conference Proceedings 1641(1): 369-377.Yang, W., Gibson, J.D. and He, T. (2005) Coefficient rate and lossy source coding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 51(1): 381-386.Zass, R. and Shashua, A. (2005) A unifying approach to hard and probabilistic clustering. In: Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’05). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 294-301. 

Stock Return Dynamics after Analyst Recommendation Revisions

Andrey Kudryavtsev

Correspondence: Andrey Kudryavtsev, andreyk@yvc.ac.il

Department of Economics and Management, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Israel

pdf (1176.06 Kb) | doi:

Abstract

The study explores the correlation between the immediate and the longer-term stock returns following analyst recommendation revisions. In line with previous studies, documenting that recommendation revisions are followed by significant stock price drifts , I suggest that if a recommendation revision is followed by a relatively large short-term stock price drift, then it may indicate that the new information is more completely reflected by the respective stock's price, creating significantly less reasons for subsequent longer-term price drift, which therefore, should be significantly less pronounced compared to the one following another recommendation revision which is not immediately followed by a significant price drift in a short run. Employing a sample of recommendation revisions, I establish that positive (negative) one-, three- and six-month stock price drifts after recommendation upgrades (downgrades) are significantly more pronounced if the latter are immediately followed by relatively low (high) short-term (5- or 10-day) cumulative abnormal returns. The effect remains robust after accounting for additional company-specific (size, Market-Model beta, historical volatility) and event-specific (number of recommendation categories changed in the revision, analyst experience) factors.

Keywords:

  Analyst Recommendation Revisions; Behavioral Finance; Overreaction; Stock Price Drifts.


References

Barber, B., R. Lehavy, M. McNichols, and B. Trueman, 2001, Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Security Analyst Recommendations and Stock Returns, Journal of Finance, 56(2), 531–563.

Beyer, A., D.A. Cohen, T.Z., Lys, and B.R. Walther, 2010, The Financial Reporting Environment: Review of the Recent Literature, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 296-343.

Boni, L., and K.L. Womack, 2006, Analysts, Industries, and Price Momentum, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(1), 85-109.

Brav, A., and R. Lehavy, 2003, An Empirical Analysis of Analysts' Target Prices: Short-Term Informativeness and Long-Term Dynamics, Journal of Finance, 58(5), 1933-1968.

Chen, H., G. Noronha, and V. Singal, 2004, The Price Response to S&P 500 Index Additions and Deletions: Evidence of Asymmetry and a New Explanation, Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1901–1930.

Cohen, L., and A. Frazzini, 2008, Economic Links and Predictable Returns, Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1977–2011.

Della Vigna, S., and J. Pollet, 2009, Investor Inattention and Friday Earnings Announcements, Journal of Finance, 64(2), 709-749.

Diether, K.B., C.J. Malloy, and A. Scherbina, 2002, Differences of Opinion and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns, Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2113-2141.

Drake, M.S., D.T. Roulstone, and J.R. Thornock, 2012, Investor Information Demand: Evidence from Google Searches around Earnings Announcements, Journal of Accounting Research, 50(4), 1001–1040.

Elton, E.J., M.J. Gruber, and S. Grossman, 1986, Discrete Expectational Data and Portfolio Performance, Journal of Finance, 41(3), 699–713.

Francis, J., and L. Soffer, 1997, The Relative Informativeness of Analysts’ Stock Recommendations and Earnings Forecast Revisions, Journal of Accounting Research, 35(2), 193–211.

Frankel, R., S.P. Kothari, and J. Weber, 2006, Determinants of the Informativeness of Analyst Research, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41(1), 29-54.

Gavriilidis, K., P. Herbst, and A. Kagkadis, 2016, Investor Attention to Stock Recommendations, Working Paper, University of Stirling.

Gleason, C. and C. Lee, 2003, Analyst Forecast Revision and Market Price Discovery, The Accounting Review, 78(1), 193-225.

Green, C.T., 2006, The Value of Client Access to Analyst Recommendations, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(1), 1-24.

Grossman, S., 1995, Dynamic Asset Allocation and the Informationally Efficiency of Markets, Journal of Finance, 50(5), 773-778.

Healy, P.M., and K.G. Palepu, 2001, Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 405-440.

Hirshleifer, D., S.S. Lim, and S.H. Teoh, 2009, Driven to Distraction: Extraneous Events and Underreaction to Earnings News, Journal of Finance, 64 (5), 2289–2325.

Hirshleifer, D., S.S. Lim, and S.H. Teoh, 2011, Limited Investor Attention and Stock Market Misreactions to Accounting Information, Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 1(1), 35–73.

Hong, H., W. Torous, and R. Valkanov, 2007, Do Industries Lead Stock Markets? Journal of Financial Economics, 83(2), 367-396.

Hou, K., L. Peng, and W. Xiong, 2009, A Tale of Two Anomalies: The Implication of Investor Attention for Price and Earnings Momentum, Working Paper, Fisher College of Business.

Jegadeesh, N., J. Kim, and S.D. Krische, 2004, Analyzing the Analysts: When Do Recommendations Add Value? The Journal of Finance, 59 (3), 1083–1124.

Jegadeesh, N., and W. Kim, 2010, Do Analysts Herd? An Analysis of Recommendations and Market Reactions, Review of Financial Studies, 23(2), 901-937.

Kecskes, A., R. Michaely, and K.L. Womack, 2010, What Drives the Value of Analysts’ Recommendations: Earnings Estimates or Discount Rate Estimates? Working paper, Darthmouth College.

Lang, M.H., and R.J. Lundholm, 1996, Corporate Disclosure Policy and Analyst Behavior, Accounting Review, 71(4), 467-492.

Li, F., C. Lin, and T.C. Lin, 2016, The 52-Week High Stock Price and Analyst Recommendation Revisions, Working Paper, University of Hong Kong.

Li, K., J. Lockwood, L. J. Lockwood, and M. R. Uddin, 2015, Analyst Optimism and Stock Price Momentum, Working Paper.

Loh, R.K., 2010, Investor Inattention and the Underreaction to Stock Recommendations, Financial Management, 39(3), 1223–1252.

Loh, R.K., and G.M. Mian, 2006, Do Accurate Earnings Forecasts Facilitate Superior Investment Recommendations? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 455–483.

Loh, R.K., and R.M. Stulz, 2011, When Are Analyst Recommendation Changes Influential? Review of Financial Studies, 24(2), 593–627.

Malkiel, B.G., and E.F. Fama, 1970, Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work, Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.

Michaely, R., and K.L. Womack, 2006, What are Analysts Really Good at? Working Paper, Darthmouth College.

Mikhail, M.B., B.R. Walther, and R.H. Willis, 2004, Do Security Analysts Exhibit Persistent Differences in Stock Picking Ability? The Journal of Financial Economics, 74(1), 67-91.

Nagel, S., 2005, Short Sales, Institutional Investors and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2), 277-309.

Peng, L, and W. Xiong, 2006, Investor Attention, Overconfidence, and Category Learning, Journal of Financial Economics, 80(3), 563-602.

Sorescu, S. and A. Subrahmanyam, 2006, The Cross Section of Analyst Recommendations, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(1), 139–168.

Stickel, S.E., 1995, The Anatomy of the Performance of Buy and Sell Recommendations, Financial Analysts Journal, 51(5), 25-39.

Womack, K.L., 1996, Do Brokerage Analysts Recommendations Have Investment Value? Journal of Finance, 51(1), 137-167.

Yuan, Y., 2015, Market-Wide Attention, Trading, and Stock Returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 116(3), 548–564.